On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Tomas Konir wrote:
>
> > hi i have similar problem.
> > No dead disks, but after two days testing tcq patches (on 2.4). I
> > got the two ATA errors (smartctl said).
>
> *shrug* FreeBSD should have eaten some of those drives as well, it has
> been offering hw.ata.tags="1" to enable DMA QUEUED for a while now.
>
> And yes, my deathstar DTLA307045 still works without a single broken
> block, but never used TCQ beyond booting 2.5.17 once (no LVM -> not
> useful for me).
>
> Another DTLA307045 died some days ago, it has never seen TCQ.
>
I have no broken blocks. Only two errors logged in S.M.A.R.T.
I have no S.M.A.R.T. errors for one year ago. And after use TCQ there are
two errors after two days. Is is normal ?
Curently i not believe new IBM disks and TCQ. I'll wait for better disks
and stable TCQ.
MOJE
-- Tomas Konir Brno ICQ 25849167- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 07 2002 - 22:00:16 EST