Hi,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> -It is slow.
I wouldn't call it any fast when I think about the idea that 31 of my CPUs
on Hawkeye shall be stopped because I unload a module. Sometimes at high
noon my server (Hawkeye) can hardly keep up all the traffic. Just imagine
a module would be unloaded then! That's the problem I'm having with it.
What should make a lock for parts of the kernel slower than a lock for
the _whole_ kernel?
Regards,
Thunder
-- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:15 EST