Thunder from the hill wrote:
> > > - Build option for Linux Trace Toolkit (LTT)
>
> Nobody seemed to be interested in this toolkit. The (s|l)trace toolkit and
> kdb seemed to be sufficient for the most developers. (I don't whine here
> either.)
It's somewhat unfair to compare LTT to s/ltrace or kdb because they
don't serve the same purposes. The other thread on "Enhanced profiling"
should have made this very clear by now.
I've spoken to many key kernel developers about this and they all saw
its inclusion as being positive, but they also all said the same thing:
it's really Linus' decision.
In light of the recent discussions, it would be really nice to get a
definitive statement about LTT's inclusion in 2.5.
Cheers,
Karim
===================================================
Karim Yaghmour
karim@opersys.com
Embedded and Real-Time Linux Expert
===================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST