Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002

From: John Levon (movement@marcelothewonderpenguin.com)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 12:25:13 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: (RE: using 2.5.25 with IDE) On sparc64....."
Previous message: Bob Miller: "[PATCH] 2.5.25 remove global semaphore_lock spin lock."
In reply to: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002"
Next in thread: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002"
Reply: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:54:49PM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:

> In light of the recent discussions, it would be really nice to get a
> definitive statement about LTT's inclusion in 2.5.

It has been pointed out to you at least once that it would stand a much
better chance if you were to follow the kernel coding style, for one ...

And things like :

+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP /* On an SMP machine NMIs are used to implement a watchdog and will hang
+ the machine if traced. */
+ TRACE_TRAP_ENTRY(2, regs->eip);
+#endif
+

aren't very encouraging.

just my 2p
john

-- 
"I know I believe in nothing but it is my nothing"
	- Manic Street Preachers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: (RE: using 2.5.25 with IDE) On sparc64....."
Previous message: Bob Miller: "[PATCH] 2.5.25 remove global semaphore_lock spin lock."
In reply to: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002"
Next in thread: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002"
Reply: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] July 10, 2002"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:17 EST