Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible

From: Cort Dougan (cort@fsmlabs.com)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 17:09:21 EST

Next message: Hanna Linder: "Re: scalable kmap (was Re: vm lock contention reduction) (fwd)"
Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Next in thread: Mark Mielke: "Whoa... (was: Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible)"
Reply: Mark Mielke: "Whoa... (was: Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yes, please do make it a config option. 10x interrupt overhead makes me
worry. It lets users tailor the kernel to their expected load.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hanna Linder: "Re: scalable kmap (was Re: vm lock contention reduction) (fwd)"
Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Next in thread: Mark Mielke: "Whoa... (was: Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible)"
Reply: Mark Mielke: "Whoa... (was: Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST