Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit

From: Cort Dougan (cort@fsmlabs.com)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 23:02:44 EST


Large PTE's aren't free either, though. Cheap enough to implement but
there's some fragmentation that isn't easy to deal with in some
pathological cases. The virtual space is pretty tight on some archs
already.

A lot of stock distributions load most drivers as modules so a machine well
stocked with devices may run into trouble.

} Modules can be mapped using a large PTE mapping.
} I've been meaning to do this on sparc64 for a long
} time.
}
} So this TLB argument alone is not sufficient :-)
} I do concur on the "ipv4 as module is difficult to
} get correct" argument however.
} -
} To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
} the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
} More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
} Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST