Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@ngforever.de)
Date: Thu Jul 11 2002 - 19:58:29 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: spinlock assertion macros"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On 11 Jul 2002, Robert Love wrote:
> Uh, HZ is not scheduler calls per second.

Sorry, I must be sleeping...

It's disnerving to fix that stuff I'm fixing. I can't even concentrate on
reading any more. Sure, you're right.

Regards,
Thunder

-- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: spinlock assertion macros"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:21 EST