Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 16:53:08 EST

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8"
Previous message: Urban Widmark: "[PATCH] smbfs - smbiod"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Next in thread: Urban Widmark: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Reply: Urban Widmark: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

> 2.4.18 doesn't have any 'crashing' bugs in normal use. One of my
>...

Perhaps in your "normal use"...

If you mount SMB shares Oopses appear quite frequently.

> Cheers,
> Dick Johnson

cu
Adrian

--

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [CHECKER] 56 potential lock/unlock bugs in 2.5.8"
Previous message: Urban Widmark: "[PATCH] smbfs - smbiod"
In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Next in thread: Urban Widmark: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Reply: Urban Widmark: "Re: What is the most stable kernel to date?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:24 EST