Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 23:44:22 EST

Next message: Ed Sweetman: "fs/fs.o linking error in 2.5.25-dj2"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Removal of pci_find_* in 2.5"
In reply to: Dax Kelson: "[ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Next in thread: Dax Kelson: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Friday 12 July 2002 18:21, Dax Kelson wrote:
> Any suggestions or comments appreciated.

"it is clear that IF your server is stable and not prone to crashing, and/or
you have the write cache on your hard drives battery backed, you should
strongly consider using the writeback journaling mode of Ext3 versus ordered."

You probably want to suggest UPS there rather than battery backed disk
cache, since the writeback caching is predominantly on the cpu side.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ed Sweetman: "fs/fs.o linking error in 2.5.25-dj2"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Removal of pci_find_* in 2.5"
In reply to: Dax Kelson: "[ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Next in thread: Dax Kelson: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST