Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Jul 13 2002 - 09:25:28 EST


On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 07:36, jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote:
> > Because we can't tell Linux users "your (once favorite) CD-ROM is not
> > implemented in Linux (any more), and will never ever be". If we explicitly
> > exclude hardware, where do we end?!
>
> Like other mainstream operating systems :-)
>
> One thing that occurs to me, but that I don't necessarily think is a good idea,
> is that for a long time we had "old" IDE code and "new" IDE code in the kernel,
> and there is no reason why we couldn't do a similar thing, (I.E. have
> a "legacy devices will work" foo driver, and "legacy devices might

So we'd have a legacy driver called oh say 'ide-cd' and a current one
called 'ide-scsi'.

How does that change anything ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST