>From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
>>Name a single drive that is DAE capable, does not support ATAPI and
>>doesn't do DAE in lousy quality.
>I don't need to. As I said in the following paragraph, I never claimed such
>a thing existed. I am only complaining about your generalisations which to
>me imply that an alternative better interface cannot and could not exist.
>Which is a pile of crap. Maybe tomorrow someone will come up with a much
>better interface/drive. That is all I am saying. You cannot see into the
>future to be able to make such generalisations...
Why should there be such a device when there is a standard that manufacturers
implement?
>> >Note: I am not saying that there is an alternative interface or anything
>> >like that... just that your statement is fallacious.
>>
>>Your statements just proove that you didn't try to get the background
>>information
>>that is needed to find a useful and seminal future development.
>WHAT?!? Get off your high horse, will you? I never claimed anything to
>prompt this response. I am just telling you off for misleading people with
>your statements...
>Anton, who is starting to get pissed off with Mr Joerg "I know everything"
>Schilling
Well, I get pissed of the fact that it seems to be impossible to have a
technical based discussion in the Linux kernel environment.
Jörg
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
schilling@fokus.gmd.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 22:00:27 EST