Re: close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks)

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 22:46:20 EST

Next message: Stephane Wirtel: "Error in 2.5.26 : xquad_portio"
Previous message: Elladan: "Re: close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks)"
Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Consider: There is no guarantee that close will detect errors. Only
> NFS and Coda implement f_op->flush methods.

And AFS, I believe. (Not in the standard kernel, of course.)

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephane Wirtel: "Error in 2.5.26 : xquad_portio"
Previous message: Elladan: "Re: close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks)"
Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:22 EST