Re: [RFC] Groups beyond 32

From: Austin Gonyou (austin@digitalroadkill.net)
Date: Thu Jul 18 2002 - 00:07:15 EST

Next message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] Fix token ring compile"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] flags must be unsigned long"
In reply to: Tim Hockin: "Re: [RFC] Groups beyond 32"
Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: [RFC] Groups beyond 32"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ahh....good to know. Thanks for all the information guys. We'll hold off
till this is done I think, then come back around and see what it buys
us. THX much.

On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 18:42, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > (glibc has #define NGROUPS NGROUPS_MAX).
> >
> > > 3. Is there any true advantage to supporting more than 32 groups, or
> > > creating "meta-groups" to get around the problem?
> >
> > There probably is.
>
> We have patches to fix all this groups stuff, and I have every intention of
> submitting them Real Soon Now. Our offices are moving, so stuff is hither
> and thither.
>
> Tim
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Austin Gonyou <austin@digitalroadkill.net>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] Fix token ring compile"
Previous message: Anton Blanchard: "[PATCH] flags must be unsigned long"
In reply to: Tim Hockin: "Re: [RFC] Groups beyond 32"
Next in thread: Jesse Pollard: "Re: [RFC] Groups beyond 32"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST