Re: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout

From: Richard Stallman (rms@gnu.org)
Date: Sun Jul 21 2002 - 15:14:41 EST

Next message: Bruce Harada: "Re: build error when SMP = No"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] "big IRQ lock" removal, 2.5.27-A1"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout"
Next in thread: dank@kegel.com: "Re: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This is extremely useful behaviour. POSIX is broken here. Fix it in the
C library or somewhere it doesn't harm the clueful

Why is it useful? For signal handlers to see how much waiting time is
left?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bruce Harada: "Re: build error when SMP = No"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] "big IRQ lock" removal, 2.5.27-A1"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout"
Next in thread: dank@kegel.com: "Re: [PATCH] 'select' failure or signal should not update timeout"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:36 EST