Re: [PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Mon Jul 22 2002 - 14:08:36 EST


On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:02:41PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> hch@infradead.org said:
> > The fastcall definition should go into an asm/ header instead of such
> > hacks..
>
> And I'm supposed to fix this as part of the UML patch?

Yes. as part of the XFS merge preparation I'm also fixing generic kernel
issues.

> > the disk accounting stuff is also bogus - instead of wasting ram with
> > huge array it should rather be dynamically-allocated in a per-disk
> > structure..
>
> And this too?

No. but you could just wait for that going in and live without disk
statistics for that time.. :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:40 EST