Re: [PATCH] VM accounting 1/3 trivial

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 25 2002 - 17:31:49 EST


On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 21:31, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> You have no protection against the earlier NORESERVEs, and I'm unclear
> whether or not you want that additional protection: it's a little like
> "Tainted", you won't want people raising bugs against no-overcommit when

There are two things I want to fix there - one is to account noreserve
but not fail it, the other is to allow a root reservation

As to the other tests I'd rather get it merged, test it hard in a real
2.5 release and then go over and fix the other stuff and add features

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:22 EST