Re: 2.4.19-rc3-ac3 ide_map_buffer/ide_unmap_buffer

• Next message: bert hubert: "Linux Weekly News dying - any help?"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
• In reply to: Charles R. Anderson: "2.4.19-rc3-ac3 ide_map_buffer/ide_unmap_buffer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 00:38, Charles R. Anderson wrote:
>
> Which one should I apply? I'm inclined to keep the Red Hat bits, since
> the ac3 ide_unmap_buffer does nothing.
>
> [For anyone wondering, I have a new Dell with an Intel 845G chipset for
> which I would like DMA support, etc. I'm attempting to merge
> 2.4.19-rc3-ac3 with Red Hat's patches. If anyone has a simple patch for
> 82801DB IDE DMA support which applies to 2.4.18 I'd be much obliged.]

Thats a non trivial merge. I don't think there is anything in the base
RH that matters except for big (1Gb plus) servers that isnt in -ac. You
can also pick up the rawhide kernel if you are brave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: bert hubert: "Linux Weekly News dying - any help?"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH]: uClinux (MMU-less) patches against 2.5.28"
• In reply to: Charles R. Anderson: "2.4.19-rc3-ac3 ide_map_buffer/ide_unmap_buffer"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 14:00:23 EST