>>>>> On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 22:20:53 -0700 (PDT), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> said:
DaveM> From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date:
DaveM> Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:24:05 -0700
DaveM> In my opinion the proposed large-page patch addresses a
DaveM> relatively pressing need for databases (primarily).
DaveM> Databases want large pages with IPC_SHM, how can this
DaveM> special syscal hack address that?
I believe the interface is OK in that regard. AFAIK, Oracle is happy
with it.
DaveM> It's great for experimentation, but give up syscall slots
DaveM> for this?
I'm a bit concerned about this, too. My preference would have been to
use the regular mmap() and shmat() syscalls with some
augmentation/hint as to what the preferred page size is (Simon
Winwood's OLS 2002 paper talks about some options here). I like this
because hints could be useful even with a transparent superpage
scheme.
The original Intel patch did use more of a hint-like approach (the
hint was a simple binary flag though: give me regular pages or give me
large pages), but Linus preferred a separate syscall interface, so the
Intel folks switched over to doing that.
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST