> mmap, munmap, and mprotect by adding another argument, I'm not. I'm talking
> about adding new syscalls, mmap2, munmap2, mprotect2 (or something more
> imaginative), which have the extra argument, having them take -1 as meaning
> "fiddle the current address space" and pursuading libc to use them instead
> of the current syscalls. Then we would start the current ones on their way
> to the happy syscall hunting grounds in the sky.
Thats a lot more invasive than I want to be
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:20 EST