Re: context switch vs. signal delivery [was: Re: Accelerating user mode linux]

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:44:40 EST


Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > And threads can do queued events that amortizes context switch
> > overhead, while queued signals generate per-event signal delivery, so
> > signal delivery costs are not amortized.
> >
> > (Not that i advocate SIGIO or helper threads for highperformance IO -
> > Ben's aio interface is the fastest and most correct approach.)
>
> Isn't the per-event queued signal cost amortised when using sigwaitinfo()?

Of course I meant:

  Isn't the per-event queued signal cost amortised when using sigtimedwait()?

cheers,
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST