Re: ethtool documentation

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Tue Aug 06 2002 - 14:44:16 EST


On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Chris Friesen wrote:

| "Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
|
| > Because of this, there is no such thing as 'unused eeprom space' in
| > the Ethernet Controllers. Be careful about putting this weapon in
| > the hands of the 'public'. All you need is for one Linux Machine
| > on a LAN to end up with the same IEEE Station Address as another
| > on that LAN and connectivity to everything on that segment will
| > stop. You do this once at an important site and Linux will get a
| > very black eye.
|
| Can't we already tell cards (some of them anyway) what MAC address to use when
| sending packets? This doesn't overwrite the EEPROM, but it does last for that
| session...

Sure, and that doesn't violate any IEEE Ethernet standards.
Locally Administered Addresses are allowed.
Just make sure that they don't conflict with other addresses.

-- 
~Randy

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:33 EST