Re: 64bit clean drivers was Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre1

From: Alan Cox (alan@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Aug 07 2002 - 06:10:36 EST


> dep_bool .... $CONFIG_X86_32
>
> Would that be acceptable for you? (ok that would not cover ppc32 for
> example, but they may have other issues with the driver)

dep_bool doesnt have negations, bracketing or or operations. Thats why
CML1 can't handle it but CML2 probably could have

> They will discover it when they don't find a driver for an device and
> can then find the disabled configuration and look into fixing it
> (for someone able to fix the driver checking the configuration should
> be trivial)

No they'll mail you asking where it has gone

> In my opinion it is just not acceptable when the enable the driver by
> mistake or load the wrong module and it crashes.

Thats a packaging issue for distributed prebuilt kernel trees. Also crashes
are the only way you are going to find out what needs fixing, who wants to
fix it and the like
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:35 EST