Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Date: Thu Aug 08 2002 - 06:09:08 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Previous message: Rob Radez: "Watchdog Updates"
In reply to: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Next in thread: Joshua MacDonald: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thursday 08 August 2002 09:58, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> And for Gods sake ;-) - please call it ASSERT_ and not MUST_THIS
> MUST_THAT MUST_GO_TO_TOILET. For the nonanglosaxons among us the
> personifications already frequently enough present in english
> nomenclature sound already awfoul enough...

As I understand it, the kernel nomenclature is supposed to be English,
what is your point?

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [bug, 2.5.29, IDE] partition table corruption?"
Previous message: Rob Radez: "Watchdog Updates"
In reply to: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Next in thread: Joshua MacDonald: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:16 EST