On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 16:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm.. Giving them a quick glance-over, the /proc issues look like they
> shouldn't be there in 2.5.x anyway, since the inode number really is
> largely just a random number in 2.5 and all the real information is
> squirelled away at path open time.
>
> There's certainly a possibility for some cleanups, though.
So for now then, should I dig out my original (minimal) patch that
*just* fixed the "loop forever even if we're out of pids" problem? Even
if we increase PID_MAX to something obscenely high, I think we should
still be checking for this.
-Paul Larson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 15 2002 - 22:00:21 EST