On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 08:36:01AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> It could be. But I doubt it. At least, I don't think you can treat a
> AGP bridge like a 82801BAM/CAM bridge. I think 82801BAM/CAM is a
> special case. You really have to read the datasheet to know for sure.
You're right by all means. AGP bridges are _always_ positive decoders.
The problems you've seen were caused by the wrong semicolon somehow
sneaked into the patch:
+static void __init pci_fixup_transparent_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ if ((dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI &&
+ (dev->device & 0xff00) == 0x2400);
^ Ugh..
+ dev->class |= 1;
+}
Which means that I'm setting bit 0 in the ProgIf for _all_ Intel devices...
I'm really sorry about that.
Thanks for the pci dump - it's very useful anyway.
Ivan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST