Re: Generic list push/pop

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@lightweight.ods.org)
Date: Sun Aug 18 2002 - 14:28:00 EST

Hi,

On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> #define push_list(_LIST_, _NODE_) \
> _NODE_->next = _LIST_; \
> _LIST_ =_NODE_;
>
> #define pop_list(_LIST_) ({ \
> typeof(_LIST_) _NODE_ = _LIST_; \
> _LIST_ = _LIST_->next; \
> _NODE_; })

How do we protect against:

push_list(getFuckingList(), node);
node_t node = pop_list(getFuckingList());

? Couldn't this break the _LIST_ = _LIST_->next; ?

JAQ...

                        Thunder 

-- 
--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-
--./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST