Re: cerberus errors on 2.4.19 (ide dma related)

From: Andrew Rodland (arodland@noln.com)
Date: Sun Aug 18 2002 - 17:41:35 EST


On 18 Aug 2002 14:29:23 -0400
Ed Sweetman <safemode@speakeasy.net> wrote:

> I know i have no device nodes. I removed them all before installing
> devfs.

Well then you have no device nodes without devfs. D'uh? :)

> the devfs documentation says it doesn't need to have devfs
> mounted to work, but this doesn't seem to be true at all.

No, the devfs documentation says that it is "safe" to have devfs
compiled in and not use it -- you will just use the standard /dev. It
does not imply in any way that you will be using devfs if you don't
mount it, it says that if you choose _not_ to use devfs, then it will be
able to fall cleanly back to standard /dev. In other words,
CONFIG_DEVFS_FS provides the _ability_ to use devfs, not a
_requirement_.

That's all it says.
To assume that it means anything else would be incredibly silly.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:15 EST