>On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:59:44AM -0500, Mala Anand wrote:
>> The patch reduces the numer of cylces by 25%
>The data you are reporting is flawed: where are the average cycle
>times spent in __kfree_skb with the patch?
I measured the cycles for only the initialization code in alloc_skb
and __kfree_skb. Since the init code is removed from __kfree_skb,
no cycles are spent there.
Regards,
Mala
Mala Anand
IBM Linux Technology Center - Kernel Performance
E-mail:manand@us.ibm.com
http://www-124.ibm.comdeveloperworks/opensource/linuxperf
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/linuxperf
Phone:838-8088; Tie-line:678-8088
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 22:00:23 EST