Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Tue Aug 27 2002 - 10:23:04 EST

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: updating the partition table of a busy drive"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [patch] SImple Topology API v0.3 (1/2)"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> Then the following works properly without ugly casts or warnings:
>
> __u64 val = 1;
>
> printk("at least "PFU64" of your u64s are belong to us\n", val);

Casts are ugly but this looks even worse. I'd go for casts.
Pavel

-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: updating the partition table of a busy drive"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [patch] SImple Topology API v0.3 (1/2)"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Reply: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:20 EST