Re: [patch] SImple Topology API v0.3 (1/2)

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@lightweight.ods.org)
Date: Wed Aug 28 2002 - 08:14:00 EST


Hi,

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > - bool 'Multiquad NUMA system' CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
> > + bool 'Multi-node NUMA system support' CONFIG_X86_NUMA
>
> Why not simply CONFIG_NUMA?

Because NUMA is subordinate to X86, and another technology named NUMA
might appear? Nano-uplinked micro-array... No Ugliness Munched Archive?
Whatever...

                        Thunder

-- 
--./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
--/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
.- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-
--./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:23 EST