Hi,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Because NUMA is subordinate to X86, and another technology named NUMA
> > might appear? Nano-uplinked micro-array... No Ugliness Munched Archive?
> > Whatever...
>
> NUMA means non-uniform memory access. At least IBM, AMD and SGI do
> NUMA; and I guess anyone with 100+ nodes *has* numa machine. (BUt as
> andrea already explained, CONFIG_NUMA is already taken for generic
> NUMA support.)
I'm aware of that. You didn't get my point, though. I was just suggesting
that there might be other things called NUMA, so CONFIG_X86_NUMA may be
just right.
Thunder
-- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:24 EST