Re: Hangs in 2.4.19 and 2.4.20-pre5 (IDE-related?)

From: Andre Hedrick (andre@linux-ide.org)
Date: Thu Aug 29 2002 - 22:04:58 EST


Good cause then I take responsiblity for it.

On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:37:19PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Meelis Roos wrote:
> >
> > > pcibus = 33333
> > > 00:07.1 vendor=8086 device=7111 class=0101 irq=0 base4=f001
> > > ----------PIIX BusMastering IDE Configuration---------------
> > > Driver Version: 1.3
> > > South Bridge: 28945
> > > Revision: IDE 0x1
> > > Highest DMA rate: UDMA33
> > > BM-DMA base: 0xf000
> > > PCI clock: 33.3MHz
> > > -----------------------Primary IDE-------Secondary IDE------
> > > Enabled: yes yes
> > > Simplex only: no no
> > > Cable Type: 40w 40w
> > > -------------------drive0----drive1----drive2----drive3-----
> > > Prefetch+Post: yes yes yes yes
> > > Transfer Mode: PIO PIO PIO PIO
> > > Address Setup: 90ns 90ns 90ns 90ns
> > > Cmd Active: 360ns 360ns 360ns 360ns
> > > Cmd Recovery: 540ns 540ns 540ns 540ns
> > > Data Active: 90ns 90ns 90ns 90ns
> > > Data Recovery: 30ns 30ns 90ns 30ns
> > > Cycle Time: 120ns 120ns 180ns 120ns
> > > Transfer Rate: 16.6MB/s 16.6MB/s 11.1MB/s 16.6MB/s
> >
> > That is not my work and you are on your own for that mess.
> > That looks straight out of 2.5.30.
>
> Don't be so quick with shooing people away - this is the output of the
> 'atapci' userspace program. It only reads the PCI config registers and

Well if atapci is that complete then I see no reason to keep proc about.
So if it needs to go we delete it.

Regards,

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:29 EST