Re: [patch] scheduler fixes, 2.5.32-BK

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Fri Aug 30 2002 - 03:22:07 EST


On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:

> yep, looks like the killing of the semaphore_lock made the race go away.
>
> But ia64, sparc and x86_64 use semaphore_lock, so they still are
> exposed.

btw., this way completions become special-case semaphores optimized for
the context-switching path, not a correctness issue. At which point it's
also an interesting question whether in fact we need to make completion()
that much of a different interface?

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 31 2002 - 22:00:30 EST