Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19

• Next message: OGAWA Hirofumi: "Re: [PATCH] remove BUG_ON(p->ptrace) in release_task()"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Benchmarks for performance patches (-ck) for 2.4.19"
• In reply to: Tobias Ringstrom: "Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19"
• Next in thread: Tobias Ringstrom: "Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19"
• Reply: Tobias Ringstrom: "Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:

> While the O(1) scheduler has performed very well for me in most
> situations, I have one big problem with it. When running a
> Counter-Strike game server on Linux 2.4.19 with the sched-2.4.19-rc2-A4
> patch applied, the server process is niced from the default value of 15
> (interactive) to 25 (background). This means that every time crond
> wakes up or a mail arrives the game latency becomes extremely bad and
> the users experience lag.

does the same problem happen if you renice the game server to -10 or -15?

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: OGAWA Hirofumi: "Re: [PATCH] remove BUG_ON(p->ptrace) in release_task()"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Benchmarks for performance patches (-ck) for 2.4.19"
• In reply to: Tobias Ringstrom: "Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19"
• Next in thread: Tobias Ringstrom: "Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19"
• Reply: Tobias Ringstrom: "Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:15 EST