Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)

From: Chris Wedgwood (cw@f00f.org)
Date: Tue Sep 03 2002 - 10:56:38 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Scary SCSI disk error message"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)"
Next in thread: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)"
Reply: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 05:50:42PM +0200, Peter T. Breuer wrote:

Yes, I do have synchronization - locks are/can be shared between both
kernels using a device driver mechanism that I implemented.

What happens if one of the kernels/nodes dies?

--cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Scary SCSI disk error message"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9"
In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)"
Next in thread: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)"
Reply: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:17 EST