On 2002-09-03T18:29:02,
"Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es> said:
> > Lets say you have a perfect locking mechanism, a fake SCSI layer
> OK.
BTW, I would like to see your perfect distributed locking mechanism.
> The directory entry would ceryainly have to be reread after a write
> operation on disk that touched it - or more simply, the directory entry
> would hvae to be reread every time it were needed, i.e. be uncached.
*ouch* Sure. Right. You just have to read it from scratch every time. How
would you make readdir work?
> If that presently is not possible, then I would like to think about
> making it possible.
Just please, tell us why.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
-- Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me. --- Gregory F. Pfister- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:18 EST