I now do have a successful compile, will try to boot it in a sec.... This is from the linuxppc-2.5 tree, will do the same patches on Linus' tree to see if that compiles as well. Ok, it sort of boots as well:
Kernel command line: console=ttyS0,9600 console=tty0 root=/dev/sda2
time_init: decrementer frequency = 16.666782 MHz
Calibrating delay loop... 266.24 BogoMIPS
Memory: 62280k available (1568k kernel code, 804k data, 100k init, 0k highmem)
Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized
Dentry-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
Initializing RT netlink socket
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
Oops: kernel access of bad area, sig: 11
NIP: C000EFA0 LR: C00DF404 SP: C0363B50 REGS: c0363aa0 TRAP: 0301 Not taintedMSR: 00001032 EE: 0 PR: 0 FP: 0 ME: 1 IR/DR: 11
DAR: 00000000, DSISR: 42000000
TASK = c0360040[1] 'swapper' Last syscall: 120
last math 00000000 last altivec 00000000
GPR00: C75C0080 C0363B50 C0360040 C03F94C0 00000000 0000000E 00000001 C0363B78
GPR08: 00000000 00000000 C03F94CC C75C0000 64676500
Call backtrace:
C00DF404 C00E026C C00E036C C00E057C C020F130 C020C5F4 C020C638
C00038E0 C0008A3C
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init!
Remember this is a prep board....
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:27:16 +0200
"Oliver Pitzeier" <o.pitzeier@uptime.at> wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 September 2002 18:18, Oliver Pitzeier wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 September 2002 18:14, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > No. It seems simply missing. In 2.5.32 it is there. On the right place.
> > :o))))
> >
> > > > > process.c: In function `alpha_clone':
> > > > > process.c:268: too few arguments to function `do_fork'
> > > > > process.c: In function `alpha_vfork':
> > > > > process.c:277: too few arguments to function `do_fork'
> > > > > make[1]: *** [process.o] Error 1
> > > > > make[1]: Leaving directory
> > >
> > > Yes, the syntax changed.
>
> OK, after calling do_fork with "NULL" as extra argument. It compiles.
>
> (No, I do not want to make the kernel run fine [currently], but I want to
> trace down the count of bugs to a countable value. :o) )
>
> [ ... ]
>
> OK. The next problem seems harded to me (Maybe Ivan can help a bit!?):
>
Attached patch worked for _compiling_ on my powermac, it might help for you as well....
> gcc -Wp,-MD,./.irq.o.d -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -msmall-data
> -mcpu=ev5 -Wa,-mev6 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=irq
> -c -o irq.o irq.c
> In file included from irq.c:15:
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:28: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:28: warning: its scope is only
> this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:29: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:30: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:31: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:32: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:33: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:35: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:36: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:39: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h: In function `ptrace_link':
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:41: dereferencing pointer to
> incomplete type
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:42: warning: passing arg 1 of
> `__ptrace_link' from incompatible pointer type
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:42: warning: passing arg 2 of
> `__ptrace_link' from incompatible pointer type
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h: At top level:
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:44: warning: `struct task_struct'
> declared inside parameter list
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h: In function `ptrace_unlink':
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:46: dereferencing pointer to
> incomplete type
> /usr/src/linux-2.5.33/include/linux/ptrace.h:47: warning: passing arg 1 of
> `__ptrace_unlink' from incompatible pointer type
> make[1]: *** [irq.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.5.33/arch/alpha/kernel'
> make: *** [arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2
>
> --
> Oliver Pitzeier
> UNIX Administrator
> -
> Linux 2.4.19 i686 Load: 0.32 0.25 0.27
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:19 EST