Re: consequences of lowering "MAX_LOW_MEM"?

From: Craig Arsenault (penguin@wombat.ca)
Date: Wed Sep 04 2002 - 14:02:52 EST


On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> >I think you'll find yourself with no virtual address space left to
> >do vmalloc / fixmap / kmap type stuff. Or at least you would on i386,
> >I presume it's the same for ppc. Sounds like you may have left
> >yourself enough space for fixmap & kmap, but any calls to vmalloc
> >will probably fail ?
>
> Yes, same problem on PPC, you'll run out of virtual space quite
> quickly for vmalloc and ioremap. Stuff a video board with lots
> of VRAM or any PCI card exposing large MMIO regions into your
> machines and it will probably not even boot.
>
> Ben.
>

Ben,
  But doesn't using Matt's suggestion and moving both MAX_LOW_MEM and
changing KERNELBASE take care of this? It's an embedded board with no
video, but it does have one PCI Mezzanine Card (PMC) on it.

Thanks.

--
Craig.
+------------------------------------------------------+
http://www.wombat.ca/rpmon.html    RP Music Monitor
http://www.washington.edu/pine/    Pine @ the U of Wash.
+-------------=*sent via Pine4.44*=--------------------+

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:22 EST