On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:59:17PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > I think we should take the XFS-specific inode lock around vmtruncate.
> > Need to double-check with Steve.
>
> this is the function I'm looking at and it's called with xfs specific
> inode lock, and I don't see it grabbed either before calling vmtruncate:
should != do
we either need to use your accessors for i_size or take the XFS inode
lock around vmtruncate.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 22:00:26 EST