On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 10:29, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more careful labelling them - those are 2.5.34-preempt
> vs 2.5.34-preempt-rcu numbers. I did them first because rcu-poll-preempt
> kernel has a conditinal branch in fast path and hence more interesting.
> I will publish the vanilla vs rcu_poll reflex numbers in a few minutes
> from now.
Ahh OK. Results are OK, then - thanks :-)
> Our OLS paper and presentation too deals with preemption -
>
> http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/rclock/rcu.2002.07.08.pdf
> http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/rclock/rclock.OLS.2002.07.08a.pdf
Yep. Was there, saw the talk, got the t-shirt.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST