Re: Problem with the O(1) scheduler in 2.4.19

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 03:06:17 EST


On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:

> In other words: Any nice-0 task that has been sleeping for two seconds
> or more will be able to monololize the CPU for up to 0.7 seconds. Do
> you agree that this is a problem, or am I being too narrow-minded? :-)

well, 'monopolize' the CPU from CPU-hogs - yes. Take the CPU from other
interactive tasks: no.

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST