Re: 2.4.19 SCSI core bug?

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 10:42:01 EST


On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:39:23AM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> I have a cleanup patch for 2.5 scsi_error I will add this fix in.
> scsi_send_eh_cmnd should not be retrying the command it should return to
> the caller the status and let them decide. We also should create a
> ?restore_scsi_cb? function that is shared so that it is done
> consistently.

I've got a patch for both of these now. I'm working through some other
issues at the moment though (like, why the hell requests for sectors
after the sector in error don't have a data phase, and the drive returns
status = GOOD, message = COMMAND COMPLETE, leading the kernel to believe
that it did transfer data.)

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST