Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 18:05:31 EST

Next message: Thunder from the hill: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:

| Look, idunnoigiveup. Like scsi and USB, NFS is a black hole
| where akpms fear to tread.

hehe.

s/NFS/VM/
s/akpms/me et al/

Fortunately we have a large developer community with different
(complementary) points of view and interests.

-- ~Randy "Linux is not a research project. Never was, never will be." -- Linus, 2002-09-02

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Thunder from the hill: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "RE: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: invalidate_inode_pages in 2.5.32/3"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:31 EST