Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] 2.0-2.5 bug in ip_options_compile"
• Previous message: Nivedita Singhvi: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
• In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 02:53:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So I suggest you do something local for the while, plan to use that later.
> (Actually, the implementation would probably have a heart attack if you
> asked for 100,000 pages so you may need to sit in a loop there; we'll see).

Actually, that's probably going to trip the NMI oopser.

Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] 2.0-2.5 bug in ip_options_compile"
• Previous message: Nivedita Singhvi: "Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000"
• In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: Good way to free as much memory as possible under 2.5.34?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:35 EST