On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 12:26:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > I use UML all the time. It's great, but it doesn't work for SMP debugging.
>
> That should not be something fundamental, though. It should be perfectly
> doable with threading. "SMOP".
I run into problems fairly often that I can't reproduce in UML - timing
sensitive, hardware sensitive, etc. Some of them KGDB perturbs too
much to be useful, but most of the time I can get it to work. UML also
doesn't use a lot of the code under arch/i386/ (or didn't at least)
which makes debugging that code under UML a bit futile.
> Yeah, and gdb (not to mention all the grapical nice stuff) sucks in a
> threaded environment. At least it used to.
Well, yeah. It's getting a little bit better - a lot better for some
cases - but no one's really sure where it needs to go to keep
improving. I'm making a little progress.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 22:00:38 EST