On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:35:14PM -0700, James Cleverdon wrote:
> Patch that allows IBM x440 boxes to on-line all CPUs and interrupt routing for
> x360s. Fixed x360 ID bug.
- Is this the same summit code as is in 2.4-ac ?
(Ie, the one that boots on non summit systems too)
- I believe the way forward here is to work with James Bottomley,
who has a nice abstraction of the areas your patch touches for
his Voyager sub-architecture.
Linus has however been completley silent on the x86-subarch idea
despite heavyweights like Alan and Ingo adding their support...
If you go this route, James' base needs to go in first
(converting just the in-kernel visws support). After which, adding
support for Voyager, Summit and any other wacky x86esque hardware
is a simple non-intrusive patch that touches subarch specific areas.
- Some of the code you've added looks along the lines of..
else if (summit)
Would it be over-abstracting to have some form of APIC struct,
defining pointers to various routines instead of lots of ugly
However, the last point may be completley pointless after adapting to
use what James B has come up with..
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST