Re: Virtual to physical address mapping

• Next message: Con Kolivas: "[BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
• In reply to: Ole André Vadla Ravnås : "Virtual to physical address mapping"
• Next in thread: Ole André Vadla Ravnås : "Re: Virtual to physical address mapping"
• Reply: Ole André Vadla Ravnås : "Re: Virtual to physical address mapping"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 7:54am +0200 9/18/02, Ole André Vadla Ravnås wrote:
>I've noticed that ifconfig shows a base address and an interrupt
>number.. However, I can't get that base address to correspond to
>anything in /proc/iomem, which means that I can't determine which PCI
>device (in this case) it corresponds to (guess the base address is
>virtual). What I want is to find a way to get the PCI bus and device no
>for the network device, but is this at all possible without altering the
>kernel?

ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO will do that directly, if the driver supports it.

-- 
/Jonathan Lundell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Con Kolivas: "[BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK"
• In reply to: Ole André Vadla Ravnås : "Virtual to physical address mapping"
• Next in thread: Ole André Vadla Ravnås : "Re: Virtual to physical address mapping"
• Reply: Ole André Vadla Ravnås : "Re: Virtual to physical address mapping"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:22 EST