Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] In-kernel module loader 3/7"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David S. Miller wrote:

> It's hash lookup code, nearly identical to ipv4 version except
> it's dealing with 128-bit IP addresses instead of 32-bit.
>
> You give up way too easily, which leads me to belive you'll disappear
> just as easily if complicated bugs stop popping up as a result of your
> changes.

I'll maintain this patch for myself if no one else, so I will not
go away. But, since I am new to this code, and do not have a test
setup to test the ipv6 changes, I was hesitant. I can at the least
patch it how I think it should be and test that ipv4 still works and
it compiles. If you or someone else can do more profound testing on
it, then that would be great.

> The #ifdefs were per request, I personally would like them not to be there
> either. As far as I can tell, the changes are backwards compatible, so there
> should be no need for ifdefs.
>
> I mean put the ifdefs in a header file such as tcp.h, not in the *.c
> code.

Would you object to me just removing all of them and having the patch
unconditionally compiled in?

> I don't require you to test the ipv6 portions, I will be able to
> eyeball them and know if they are right or not, this is how simple
> the ipv6 version of the tcp bits will be.

Ok, I'll work up a patch with the ipv6 support and try to get that
out sometime next week.

Thanks,
Ben

> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>       <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc      http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD:  http://scry.wanfear.com     http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] In-kernel module loader 3/7"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST