On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:05:17AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> > > It doesn't sound like you read the patch at all.
> > I looked at it and searched for base.c but didnt find it,
> > so concluded that the real problem was not addressed.
> because, as mentioned before, that particular loop i fixed in 2.5.35.
In that case, sorry for complaining about that part - I was
looking at 2.5.33. But now that I look at patch-2.5.35
I don't see any improvement: for_each_task() is now called
for_each_process(), but otherwise base.c is just as quadratic
as it was.
So, why do you think this problem has been fixed?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:26 EST