Re: [chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results

From: Paolo Ciarrocchi (ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 11:10:18 EST

Next message: Drew J. Como: "PROBLEM: Kernel Panic for unknown reason - Additional Info"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Syscall changes registers beyond %eax, on linux-i386"
Maybe in reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "[chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: [chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
[...]
> > There's also some kind of hint that preemption improves throughput
> > here.
>
> Any chance of doing two runs on exactly the same kernel, one with
> preempt on, and the other with preempt off? That's a much nicer
> hint ;-)
Yep! you are rigth, but I can performe this test only with 2.5.33 and 2.5.34.
2.5.36 oops at boot if the preemption is ON. Robert!!

But, do this test using local network produce results very variable (5-10 %).

Ciao,
Paolo

-- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org

Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Drew J. Como: "PROBLEM: Kernel Panic for unknown reason - Additional Info"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Syscall changes registers beyond %eax, on linux-i386"
Maybe in reply to: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "[chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results"
Next in thread: Paolo Ciarrocchi: "Re: [chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 23 2002 - 22:00:26 EST